WHATSAPP INC. v. INTERCARRIER COMMUNICATIONS LLC, 3:13-CV-4272-JST. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20140825698
Visitors: 11
Filed: Aug. 22, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 22, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION TO WITHDRAW EXPERT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DECLARATIONS JON S. TIGAR, District Judge. WHEREAS WhatsApp, Inc. ("WhatsApp") included with its responsive claim construction brief a Declaration of Michael J. Freedman in Support of WhatsApp's Responsive Claim Construction Brief. WHEREAS ICC has raised with WhatsApp the procedural issue that neither party had disclosed expert testimony in the parties' Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing Statement. WHEREAS InterCarrier Communications, L
Summary: STIPULATION TO WITHDRAW EXPERT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DECLARATIONS JON S. TIGAR, District Judge. WHEREAS WhatsApp, Inc. ("WhatsApp") included with its responsive claim construction brief a Declaration of Michael J. Freedman in Support of WhatsApp's Responsive Claim Construction Brief. WHEREAS ICC has raised with WhatsApp the procedural issue that neither party had disclosed expert testimony in the parties' Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing Statement. WHEREAS InterCarrier Communications, LL..
More
STIPULATION TO WITHDRAW EXPERT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DECLARATIONS
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.
WHEREAS WhatsApp, Inc. ("WhatsApp") included with its responsive claim construction brief a Declaration of Michael J. Freedman in Support of WhatsApp's Responsive Claim Construction Brief.
WHEREAS ICC has raised with WhatsApp the procedural issue that neither party had disclosed expert testimony in the parties' Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing Statement.
WHEREAS InterCarrier Communications, LLC ("ICC"), as a precaution, included with its reply claim construction brief a Declaration of Regis J. Bates Jr. in Support of InterCarrier Communications LLC's Reply Claim Construction Brief.
WHEREAS the parties prefer to avoid any possibility that they may be acting out of concert with the Patent Local Rules.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among the parties and their respective counsel of record and with the permission of the Court, that the parties withdraw their respective expert declarations and all citations to these declarations in the claim-construction briefing.
ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle