Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Vaughan v. Hendrix, 2:19-cv-46-DPM. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20191022694 Visitors: 29
Filed: Oct. 21, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 21, 2019
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . Motion to reconsider, No 13, denied. This Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to hear Vaughan's 2241 petition. If Vaughn wants to challenge the lawfulness of his conviction and sentence, then he must do so through a 2255 motion in the sentencing court. And if he wants to challenge the conditions of his confinement, then he must do so through a 1983 complaint. So Ordered.

ORDER

Motion to reconsider, No 13, denied. This Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to hear Vaughan's§ 2241 petition. If Vaughn wants to challenge the lawfulness of his conviction and sentence, then he must do so through a § 2255 motion in the sentencing court. And if he wants to challenge the conditions of his confinement, then he must do so through a § 1983 complaint.

So Ordered.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer