Harris v. Kroger Limited Partnership I, 4:18-cv-00153-KGB. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20190829681
Visitors: 11
Filed: Aug. 28, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 28, 2019
Summary: ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER , District Judge . Before the Court is a stipulation of dismissal filed by plaintiff Tawanna Harris and defendants Kroger Limited Partnership I and Jerry Elerby (Dkt. No. 40). Counsel for these parties have signed the stipulation ( Id., at 2). Accordingly, the stipulation accords with the terms of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The Court adopts the stipulation of dismissal (Dkt. No. 40). The Court therefore dismisses with prejudice this action an
Summary: ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER , District Judge . Before the Court is a stipulation of dismissal filed by plaintiff Tawanna Harris and defendants Kroger Limited Partnership I and Jerry Elerby (Dkt. No. 40). Counsel for these parties have signed the stipulation ( Id., at 2). Accordingly, the stipulation accords with the terms of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The Court adopts the stipulation of dismissal (Dkt. No. 40). The Court therefore dismisses with prejudice this action and..
More
ORDER
KRISTINE G. BAKER, District Judge.
Before the Court is a stipulation of dismissal filed by plaintiff Tawanna Harris and defendants Kroger Limited Partnership I and Jerry Elerby (Dkt. No. 40). Counsel for these parties have signed the stipulation (Id., at 2). Accordingly, the stipulation accords with the terms of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).
The Court adopts the stipulation of dismissal (Dkt. No. 40). The Court therefore dismisses with prejudice this action and finds that each party shall bear its own fees and costs. The Court denies as moot all remaining pending motions (Dkt. Nos. 17, 25, 31, 32).
It is so ordered.
Source: Leagle
