Walker v. Arnold, 2:16cv187-ECM. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20180918892
Visitors: 28
Filed: Sep. 17, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 17, 2018
Summary: OPINION and ORDER EMILY C. MARKS , District Judge . On August 24, 2018, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (doc. # 75) to which no objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2. The plaintiff's motion to dismiss is GRANTED. 3. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice. 4. No costs are taxed. A separate final judgment will b
Summary: OPINION and ORDER EMILY C. MARKS , District Judge . On August 24, 2018, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (doc. # 75) to which no objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2. The plaintiff's motion to dismiss is GRANTED. 3. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice. 4. No costs are taxed. A separate final judgment will be..
More
OPINION and ORDER
EMILY C. MARKS, District Judge.
On August 24, 2018, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (doc. # 75) to which no objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is hereby
ORDERED that:
1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.
2. The plaintiff's motion to dismiss is GRANTED.
3. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice.
4. No costs are taxed.
A separate final judgment will be entered in accordance with this order.
Source: Leagle
