Miller v. Krank, 5:18CV00146-JM-JTK. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20190408952
Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 05, 2019
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, JR. , District Judge . The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, or in the alternative, for Summary Judgment, which this Court construes as a Motion for Summary Judgmen
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, JR. , District Judge . The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, or in the alternative, for Summary Judgment, which this Court construes as a Motion for Summary Judgment..
More
ORDER
JAMES M. MOODY, JR., District Judge.
The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, or in the alternative, for Summary Judgment, which this Court construes as a Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 30) is GRANTED.
An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
