Carreon v. Saul, 1:19-cv-00759-GSA. (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20200121d55
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 17, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 17, 2020
Summary: ORDER VACATING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Doc. 11 GARY S. AUSTIN , Magistrate Judge . On January 13, 2020, the Court issued an order to show cause why the above-captioned case should not be dismissed following Plaintiff's failure to file proof of service of the confidential letter brief in compliance with the Scheduling Order (Doc. 4). On January 15, 2020, Plaintiff responded to the order to show cause and filed proof of service. Accordingly, the Order to Show Cause is hereby VACATED. IT IS SO
Summary: ORDER VACATING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Doc. 11 GARY S. AUSTIN , Magistrate Judge . On January 13, 2020, the Court issued an order to show cause why the above-captioned case should not be dismissed following Plaintiff's failure to file proof of service of the confidential letter brief in compliance with the Scheduling Order (Doc. 4). On January 15, 2020, Plaintiff responded to the order to show cause and filed proof of service. Accordingly, the Order to Show Cause is hereby VACATED. IT IS SO O..
More
ORDER VACATING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Doc. 11
GARY S. AUSTIN, Magistrate Judge.
On January 13, 2020, the Court issued an order to show cause why the above-captioned case should not be dismissed following Plaintiff's failure to file proof of service of the confidential letter brief in compliance with the Scheduling Order (Doc. 4). On January 15, 2020, Plaintiff responded to the order to show cause and filed proof of service.
Accordingly, the Order to Show Cause is hereby VACATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
