Haowei v. Jennings, 1:18-cv-01709-EPG-HC. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190404881
Visitors: 25
Filed: Apr. 02, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 02, 2019
Summary: ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Petitioner is a federal immigration detainee proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 that challenges Petitioner's detention pending removal. On February 14, 2019, Respondents filed a motion to dismiss the petition, arguing that Petitioner has been granted an opportunity for release and that this Court would have no jurisdiction over a possible challenge to modify the bo
Summary: ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Petitioner is a federal immigration detainee proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 that challenges Petitioner's detention pending removal. On February 14, 2019, Respondents filed a motion to dismiss the petition, arguing that Petitioner has been granted an opportunity for release and that this Court would have no jurisdiction over a possible challenge to modify the bon..
More
ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING
ERICA P. GROSJEAN, Magistrate Judge.
Petitioner is a federal immigration detainee proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 that challenges Petitioner's detention pending removal.
On February 14, 2019, Respondents filed a motion to dismiss the petition, arguing that Petitioner has been granted an opportunity for release and that this Court would have no jurisdiction over a possible challenge to modify the bond amount. (ECF No. 13 at 1-2).1 In his opposition to the motion, Petitioner argues inter alia that the "government's bond-setting policies practices failed to require immigration officials to consider financial circumstances and alternative conditions of release." (ECF No. 15 at 1).
The Court finds that supplemental briefing addressing Hernandez v. Sessions, 872 F.3d 976 (9th Cir. 2017), and the alleged failure of immigration officials to consider financial circumstances and alternative conditions of relief in making the bond determination would assist the Court in this matter. Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS:
1. Within thirty (30) days of the date of service of this order, Respondent shall file a supplemental brief addressing the issues set forth above; and
2. Within thirty (30) days of the date of service of Respondent's brief, Petitioner may file a response to Respondent's brief.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Page numbers refer to the ECF page numbers stamped at the top of the page.
Source: Leagle
