Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Mitchell v. Berryhill, 2:18-CV-01798-DMC. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190314890 Visitors: 16
Filed: Mar. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 13, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S OPENING BRIEF DENNIS M. COTA , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, to extend the time 30 Days to April 15, 2019, for Plaintiff to file his Opening Brief, in accordance with the Court's Scheduling Order. This is Plaintiff's third request for an extension. It is requested due to the fact that Plaintiff's counsel experienced an extended illness that caused a backlog in he
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S OPENING BRIEF

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, to extend the time 30 Days to April 15, 2019, for Plaintiff to file his Opening Brief, in accordance with the Court's Scheduling Order. This is Plaintiff's third request for an extension. It is requested due to the fact that Plaintiff's counsel experienced an extended illness that caused a backlog in her District Court workload and, in addition, she is representing appellants in four Ninth Circuit cases that are now in the briefing process.

The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order be modified accordingly.

ORDER

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED, subject to NOTICE to all counsel that no additional extensions will be granted for preparation of Plaintiff's Opening Brief.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer