METCALF v. HETZEL, 2:13cv-002-WHA (WO). (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20151202941
Visitors: 19
Filed: Dec. 01, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 01, 2015
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON , Senior District Judge . This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #22), entered on October 22, 2015. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. 2. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the Defendants. 3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. Costs
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON , Senior District Judge . This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #22), entered on October 22, 2015. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. 2. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the Defendants. 3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. Costs ..
More
ORDER
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge.
This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #22), entered on October 22, 2015. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. The Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.
2. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the Defendants.
3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
4. Costs are taxed against the Plaintiff.
Source: Leagle
