PARR v. FIRST RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 4:15-cv-01868-HSG. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170515d31
Visitors: 11
Filed: May 12, 2017
Latest Update: May 12, 2017
Summary: JUDGMENT HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . This matter having come before the Court for decision, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff Cheri Parr and against defendant First Reliance Standard Insurance Company on the First Cause of Action (Recovery of Employee Benefits under 29 U.S.C. 1132(a)(1)(B)) in the total amount of $519,917.24. This is comprised of benefits in the amount of $500,120.79 through June 6, 2017 and pre-judgment interest in the am
Summary: JUDGMENT HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . This matter having come before the Court for decision, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff Cheri Parr and against defendant First Reliance Standard Insurance Company on the First Cause of Action (Recovery of Employee Benefits under 29 U.S.C. 1132(a)(1)(B)) in the total amount of $519,917.24. This is comprised of benefits in the amount of $500,120.79 through June 6, 2017 and pre-judgment interest in the amo..
More
JUDGMENT
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr., District Judge.
This matter having come before the Court for decision,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff Cheri Parr and against defendant First Reliance Standard Insurance Company on the First Cause of Action (Recovery of Employee Benefits under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B)) in the total amount of $519,917.24. This is comprised of benefits in the amount of $500,120.79 through June 6, 2017 and pre-judgment interest in the amount of $19,796.45, at the rate of 2.5 percent. The plaintiff's claim for benefits is remanded to the defendant for adjudication of ongoing benefits in accordance with the terms and conditions of the long-term disability plan.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of defendant First Reliance Standard Insurance Company and against plaintiff Cheri Parr on the Third Cause of Action (Failure to Produce Documents under 29 U.S.C. § 1024(b)(4)).
Source: Leagle
