LANEY v. DYVIS, INC., 2:17cv81-MHT. (2017)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20170609a53
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jun. 08, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 08, 2017
Summary: OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Plaintiff failed to perfect service on defendant within 90 days after filing of the complaint, which was required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. Plaintiff then failed to respond to the order of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 4) to show good cause before May 30, 2017, for failing to comply with Rule 4. Accordingly, the court concludes that plaintiff has abandoned this lawsuit, and that dismissal of the case is appropriate. An
Summary: OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Plaintiff failed to perfect service on defendant within 90 days after filing of the complaint, which was required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. Plaintiff then failed to respond to the order of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 4) to show good cause before May 30, 2017, for failing to comply with Rule 4. Accordingly, the court concludes that plaintiff has abandoned this lawsuit, and that dismissal of the case is appropriate. An ..
More
OPINION
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff failed to perfect service on defendant within 90 days after filing of the complaint, which was required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. Plaintiff then failed to respond to the order of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 4) to show good cause before May 30, 2017, for failing to comply with Rule 4. Accordingly, the court concludes that plaintiff has abandoned this lawsuit, and that dismissal of the case is appropriate.
An appropriate judgment will be entered.
Source: Leagle
