ORDER

SUSAN O. HICKEY, Chief District Judge.

Before the Court is Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion to File Under Seal. (ECF No. 223). The Court finds that no response is required and that the matter is ripe for consideration.

On April 2, 2015, the Court entered a Stipulated Protective Order. (ECF No. 62). Pursuant to the Order, documents produced and information disclosed at a deposition in this action may be designated as "Confidential," and any papers filed with the Court that include "Confidential" information must be filed under seal. Defendant has designated as "Confidential" certain documents and deposition testimony addressing, inter alia, insureds' personal information, adjusting practices, and other competitively sensitive business information.

In support of their motion for summary judgment, Plaintiffs intend to discuss, cite, and attach as exhibits a number of "Confidential" documents. To that end, Plaintiffs request leave to redact their motion, brief, and accompanying exhibits, and to provide the Court with unredacted copies of the same. Due to this, the Court construes the instant motion as a Motion to Redact. The Court understands that some portions of the motion, brief, and exhibits contain public information that is not covered by the Protective Order, which may be filed on the docket.

Because the motion, brief, and exhibits can be redacted, it is in the best interests of the public for redacted versions to be filed on the docket. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Under Seal (ECF No. 223) should be and hereby is GRANTED. The Court notes that Plaintiffs have already filed redacted versions of their motion, brief, and exhibits on the docket and have provided the Court with unredacted copies of the same. Thus, no further action is necessary regarding this issue.

IT IS SO ORDERED.