CAMERON MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. JOHNSON, 4:15-cv-04081. (2016)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20160921674
Visitors: 4
Filed: Sep. 20, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 20, 2016
Summary: ORDER BARRY A. BRYANT , Magistrate Judge . BEFORE the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Compel. ECF No. 15. With this Motion, Plaintiff seeks full and complete discovery answers from each Defendant. The Defendants have responded to this Motion. ECF No. 19. Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and (3) (2005), United States District Judge Susan O. Hickey referred this Motion to the undersigned for decision. The Court having reviewed the pleadings and based upon statements from c
Summary: ORDER BARRY A. BRYANT , Magistrate Judge . BEFORE the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Compel. ECF No. 15. With this Motion, Plaintiff seeks full and complete discovery answers from each Defendant. The Defendants have responded to this Motion. ECF No. 19. Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and (3) (2005), United States District Judge Susan O. Hickey referred this Motion to the undersigned for decision. The Court having reviewed the pleadings and based upon statements from co..
More
ORDER
BARRY A. BRYANT, Magistrate Judge.
BEFORE the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Compel. ECF No. 15. With this Motion, Plaintiff seeks full and complete discovery answers from each Defendant. The Defendants have responded to this Motion. ECF No. 19. Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and (3) (2005), United States District Judge Susan O. Hickey referred this Motion to the undersigned for decision. The Court having reviewed the pleadings and based upon statements from counsel finds Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (ECF No. 15), should be DENIED AS MOOT.
According to counsel in this matter, following the filing of this Motion, Defendants provided supplemented discovery answers. Further, the parties also entered into an Agreed Protective Order. ECF No. 22. Based upon this, Plaintiff no longer desires to pursue this Motion.
Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (ECF No. 15) is DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
