Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

CAMERON MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. JOHNSON, 4:15-cv-04081. (2016)

Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20160921674
Filed: Sep. 20, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 20, 2016
Summary: ORDER BARRY A. BRYANT , Magistrate Judge . BEFORE the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Compel. ECF No. 15. With this Motion, Plaintiff seeks full and complete discovery answers from each Defendant. The Defendants have responded to this Motion. ECF No. 19. Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and (3) (2005), United States District Judge Susan O. Hickey referred this Motion to the undersigned for decision. The Court having reviewed the pleadings and based upon statements from c
More

ORDER

BEFORE the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Compel. ECF No. 15. With this Motion, Plaintiff seeks full and complete discovery answers from each Defendant. The Defendants have responded to this Motion. ECF No. 19. Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and (3) (2005), United States District Judge Susan O. Hickey referred this Motion to the undersigned for decision. The Court having reviewed the pleadings and based upon statements from counsel finds Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (ECF No. 15), should be DENIED AS MOOT.

According to counsel in this matter, following the filing of this Motion, Defendants provided supplemented discovery answers. Further, the parties also entered into an Agreed Protective Order. ECF No. 22. Based upon this, Plaintiff no longer desires to pursue this Motion.

Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (ECF No. 15) is DENIED AS MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer