Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

McCARRELL v. CITY OF FORT SMITH, 2:16-CV-02117. (2016)

Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20161118830 Visitors: 7
Filed: Nov. 17, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 17, 2016
Summary: ORDER P.K. HOLMES, III , Chief District Judge . Currently before the Court is the Plaintiff's motion to dismiss with prejudice her claims against Separate Defendants City of Fort Smith, Arkansas, Kevin D. Lindsey, and Jeffrey Blue Lum. (Doc. 20). It appearing that the parties have settled this matter and are in agreement, it is ORDERED that the Plaintiff's motion (Doc. 20) is GRANTED, and her claims against those Defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Because the only remaining claims
More

ORDER

Currently before the Court is the Plaintiff's motion to dismiss with prejudice her claims against Separate Defendants City of Fort Smith, Arkansas, Kevin D. Lindsey, and Jeffrey Blue Lum. (Doc. 20).

It appearing that the parties have settled this matter and are in agreement, it is ORDERED that the Plaintiff's motion (Doc. 20) is GRANTED, and her claims against those Defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Because the only remaining claims are state law torts against Defendants Terry Coyne and Channan, Inc., pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3) "the Court should decline to exercise jurisdiction." Glorvigen v. Cirrus Design Corp., 581 F.3d 737, 749 (8th Cir. 2009). It is therefore ORDERED that all remaining claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer