Doering v. Rechcigl, 2:19-cv-53-DPM. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20191015926
Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 08, 2019
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL JR. , District Judge . 1. The Court withdraws the reference. 2. Unopposed motion for voluntarily dismissal, N o 43, granted. Doering's remaining claims will be dismissed without prejudice. 3. Motion for summary judgment, N o 40, denied without prejudice to Defendants' renewing it if Doering refiles. The request for a preemptive costs order, N o 44, is also denied without prejudice. If Doering refiles, then Defendants may file Rule 41(d) motion a
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL JR. , District Judge . 1. The Court withdraws the reference. 2. Unopposed motion for voluntarily dismissal, N o 43, granted. Doering's remaining claims will be dismissed without prejudice. 3. Motion for summary judgment, N o 40, denied without prejudice to Defendants' renewing it if Doering refiles. The request for a preemptive costs order, N o 44, is also denied without prejudice. If Doering refiles, then Defendants may file Rule 41(d) motion at..
More
ORDER
D.P. MARSHALL JR., District Judge.
1. The Court withdraws the reference.
2. Unopposed motion for voluntarily dismissal, No 43, granted. Doering's remaining claims will be dismissed without prejudice.
3. Motion for summary judgment, No 40, denied without prejudice to Defendants' renewing it if Doering refiles. The request for a preemptive costs order, No 44, is also denied without prejudice. If Doering refiles, then Defendants may file Rule 41(d) motion at that time.
4. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
So Ordered.
Source: Leagle
