WILLIAMS v. CITY OF GUNTERSVILLE, 4:09-cv-1176-IPJ-RRA. (2012)
Court: District Court, N.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20120418923
Visitors: 3
Filed: Mar. 30, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 30, 2012
Summary: ORDER INGE PRYTZ JOHNSON, District Judge. On March 15, 2012, the magistrate judge filed his report and recommendation in the above-styled cause, recommending that the pending motion for sanction of dismissal be denied. To date, no objections have been filed by either party. Having now carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the magistrate judge's recommendation, the Court is of the opinion that the report is due to be and hereby is ADOPTED,
Summary: ORDER INGE PRYTZ JOHNSON, District Judge. On March 15, 2012, the magistrate judge filed his report and recommendation in the above-styled cause, recommending that the pending motion for sanction of dismissal be denied. To date, no objections have been filed by either party. Having now carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the magistrate judge's recommendation, the Court is of the opinion that the report is due to be and hereby is ADOPTED, a..
More
ORDER
INGE PRYTZ JOHNSON, District Judge.
On March 15, 2012, the magistrate judge filed his report and recommendation in the above-styled cause, recommending that the pending motion for sanction of dismissal be denied. To date, no objections have been filed by either party.
Having now carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the magistrate judge's recommendation, the Court is of the opinion that the report is due to be and hereby is ADOPTED, and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Consequently, the motion to dismiss (doc. 64) is DENIED. This case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings, including an evidentiary hearing.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
