In re Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litigation, 07-cv-5944-JST (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20161216864
Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 15, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 15, 2016
Summary: SHARP PLAINTIFFS' AND THOMSON AND TDA DEFENDANTS' STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SUSPEND PRETRIAL DEADLINES. JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . Plaintiffs Sharp Electronics Corporation and Sharp Electronics Manufacturing Company of America, Inc. (collectively, "Sharp") and Defendants Thomson SA, n/k/a Technicolor SA, Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc., n/k/a Technicolor USA, Inc. (together "Thomson") and Technologies Displays Americas, LLC ("TDA") hereby advise the Court that they h
Summary: SHARP PLAINTIFFS' AND THOMSON AND TDA DEFENDANTS' STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SUSPEND PRETRIAL DEADLINES. JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . Plaintiffs Sharp Electronics Corporation and Sharp Electronics Manufacturing Company of America, Inc. (collectively, "Sharp") and Defendants Thomson SA, n/k/a Technicolor SA, Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc., n/k/a Technicolor USA, Inc. (together "Thomson") and Technologies Displays Americas, LLC ("TDA") hereby advise the Court that they ha..
More
SHARP PLAINTIFFS' AND THOMSON AND TDA DEFENDANTS' STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SUSPEND PRETRIAL DEADLINES.
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Sharp Electronics Corporation and Sharp Electronics Manufacturing Company of America, Inc. (collectively, "Sharp") and Defendants Thomson SA, n/k/a Technicolor SA, Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc., n/k/a Technicolor USA, Inc. (together "Thomson") and Technologies Displays Americas, LLC ("TDA") hereby advise the Court that they have reached a settlement of the claims asserted by Sharp against Thomson and TDA and expect to be able to file a dismissal in February 2017. The Parties stipulate and agree, subject to this Court's approval, to the suspension of all pretrial disclosures and related deadlines in this case, including but not limited to those set forth in the Court's Pretrial Scheduling Order [Dkt. 4828], pending the execution of a settlement agreement and fulfillment of the terms of that agreement.
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i), the filer attests that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the above signatories.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
