Roberts v. Berryhill, 1:18-cv-0604-JLT. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20181221d17
Visitors: 8
Filed: Dec. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 20, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME NUNC PRO TUNC (Doc. 13) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On December 17, 2018, Plaintiff filed a stipulation of the parties for a thirty-day extension of time for Plaintiff to file an opening brief. (Doc. 13) Notably, the Scheduling Order permits a single extension of thirty days by stipulation, which has not been used by the parties. ( See Doc. 3-1 at 4) Accordingly, the Court ORDERS: 1. Plaintiff's request for an ex
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME NUNC PRO TUNC (Doc. 13) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On December 17, 2018, Plaintiff filed a stipulation of the parties for a thirty-day extension of time for Plaintiff to file an opening brief. (Doc. 13) Notably, the Scheduling Order permits a single extension of thirty days by stipulation, which has not been used by the parties. ( See Doc. 3-1 at 4) Accordingly, the Court ORDERS: 1. Plaintiff's request for an ext..
More
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME NUNC PRO TUNC
(Doc. 13)
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
On December 17, 2018, Plaintiff filed a stipulation of the parties for a thirty-day extension of time for Plaintiff to file an opening brief. (Doc. 13) Notably, the Scheduling Order permits a single extension of thirty days by stipulation, which has not been used by the parties. (See Doc. 3-1 at 4) Accordingly, the Court ORDERS:
1. Plaintiff's request for an extension of time is granted nunc pro tunc; and
2. Plaintiff SHALL file an opening brief no later than January 16, 2019.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
