SMARTFLASH LLC v. APPLE INC., 6:13cv447-JRG-KNM (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20150217e96
Visitors: 26
Filed: Feb. 13, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 13, 2015
Summary: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED RODNEY GILSTRAP, District Judge. ORDER Before the Court are Apple's and Defendants' Motions for Partial Summary Judgment of Non-infringement (6:13CV447, Doc. Nos. 271 & 272; 6:13CV448, Doc. No. 322) and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (6:13CV447, Doc. No. 390; 6:13CV448; Doc. No. 436) recommending that the Motions be denied. Having considered Defendants' Objections to the Report and Recommendation Regarding Apple's and Defendants' Motions for Partial Summ
Summary: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED RODNEY GILSTRAP, District Judge. ORDER Before the Court are Apple's and Defendants' Motions for Partial Summary Judgment of Non-infringement (6:13CV447, Doc. Nos. 271 & 272; 6:13CV448, Doc. No. 322) and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (6:13CV447, Doc. No. 390; 6:13CV448; Doc. No. 436) recommending that the Motions be denied. Having considered Defendants' Objections to the Report and Recommendation Regarding Apple's and Defendants' Motions for Partial Summa..
More
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
RODNEY GILSTRAP, District Judge.
ORDER
Before the Court are Apple's and Defendants' Motions for Partial Summary Judgment of Non-infringement (6:13CV447, Doc. Nos. 271 & 272; 6:13CV448, Doc. No. 322) and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (6:13CV447, Doc. No. 390; 6:13CV448; Doc. No. 436) recommending that the Motions be denied. Having considered Defendants' Objections to the Report and Recommendation Regarding Apple's and Defendants' Motions for Partial Summary Judgment of Non-infringement (6:13CV447, Doc. No. 415, 6:13CV448, Doc. No. 480), and having conducted a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation as to which objection was made, and finding no error therein, the Court does hereby adopt the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Apple's and Defendants' Motions for Partial Summary Judgment of Non-infringement (6:13CV447, Doc. Nos. 271 & 272; 6:13CV448, Doc. No. 322) are DENIED.
Source: Leagle
