Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. MUNOZ, 2:13-MJ-00365 CKD. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20140616596 Visitors: 12
Filed: May 27, 2014
Latest Update: May 27, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, JASON HITT, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and DOUGLAS BEEVERS, attorney for defendant CARLOS ALEXIS MUNOZ that the status conference hearing date of May 27, 2014 be vacated, and the matter be set for status conference on July 7, 2014 at 2:00 p.m. The reason for this continuance is that Mr. M
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE

DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, JASON HITT, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and DOUGLAS BEEVERS, attorney for defendant CARLOS ALEXIS MUNOZ that the status conference hearing date of May 27, 2014 be vacated, and the matter be set for status conference on July 7, 2014 at 2:00 p.m.

The reason for this continuance is that Mr. Munoz has signed the Plea Agreement and the Rule 20 documents are being processed.

Based upon the foregoing, the parties agree that the time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded from the date of signing of this order through and including July 7, 2014 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare] and Local Code T4 based upon continuity of counsel and defense preparation.

ORDER

UPON GOOD CAUSE SHOWN and the stipulation of all parties, it is ordered that the May 27, 2014 status conference hearing be continued to July 7, 2014, at 2:00 p.m. Based on the representation of defense counsel and good cause appearing there from, the Court hereby finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. It is ordered that time up to and including the July 7, 2014 status conference shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) and Local Code T-4, to allow defense counsel reasonable time to prepare.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer