GARZA v. ENOS, 2:12-cv-02332 KJN. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20140625b44
Visitors: 17
Filed: Jun. 24, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 24, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff Raul Garza and Defendants Enos, Filippello, Gibb, Saradeth, and Ybarra stipulate to the voluntary dismissal of this action with prejudice. Each party is to bear his own costs, fees, or expenses. There is no prevailing party in this action. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: June 12, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff Raul Garza and Defendants Enos, Filippello, Gibb, Saradeth, and Ybarra stipulate to the voluntary dismissal of this action with prejudice. Each party is to bear his own costs, fees, or expenses. There is no prevailing party in this action. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: June 12, 2014 ..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
[Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)]
KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff Raul Garza and Defendants Enos, Filippello, Gibb, Saradeth, and Ybarra stipulate to the voluntary dismissal of this action with prejudice.
Each party is to bear his own costs, fees, or expenses. There is no prevailing party in this action.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: June 12, 2014 Respectfully submitted,
Raul Garza
Plaintiff Pro Se
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is voluntarily dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).
Source: Leagle
