Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Abdou v. Davita Inc., 2:16-cv-02597-APG-CWH. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180327h56 Visitors: 18
Filed: Mar. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2018
Summary: JOINT STATUS REPORT AND STIPULATION AND ORDER TO WITHDRAW DAVITA PARTIES' MOTION TO COMPEL CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants Sherif W. Abdou, M.D. and Amir S. Bacchus, M.D. ("Abdou/Bacchus") and Defendants/Counterclaimants DaVita Inc. ("DaVita"), DaVita Medical Holdings, LLC, f/k/a HealthCare Partners Holdings, LLC ("HCP Holdings"), and DaVita Medical Management, LLC, f/k/a HealthCare Partners, LLC ("HCP") (collectively, the "DaVita Parties") (collectively,
More

JOINT STATUS REPORT AND STIPULATION AND ORDER TO WITHDRAW DAVITA PARTIES' MOTION TO COMPEL

Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants Sherif W. Abdou, M.D. and Amir S. Bacchus, M.D. ("Abdou/Bacchus") and Defendants/Counterclaimants DaVita Inc. ("DaVita"), DaVita Medical Holdings, LLC, f/k/a HealthCare Partners Holdings, LLC ("HCP Holdings"), and DaVita Medical Management, LLC, f/k/a HealthCare Partners, LLC ("HCP") (collectively, the "DaVita Parties") (collectively, the "Parties"), stipulate and agree as follows:

1. On August 31, 2017, the DaVita Parties filed their Motion to Compel Production of >Documents [ECF No. 49] (the "Motion to Compel"), seeking to compel documents responsive to the DaVita Parties' Requests for Production.

2. Subsequently, Abdou/Bacchus agreed to produce documents responsive to the DaVita Parties' Requests for Production.

3. Based on Abdou/Bacchus's agreement to produce documents, the Parties agreed and the Court ordered to extend Abdou/Bacchus's deadline to respond to the Motion to Compel. (ECF No. 55.)

4. Abdou/Bacchus subsequently produced documents responsive to the DaVita Parties' Requests for Production.

5. While the DaVita Parties still seek additional documents responsive to their Requests for Production, the Parties anticipate being able to informally resolve these issues.

6. Additionally, given the change in circumstances, if the Parties are not able to resolve their discovery disputes, the Parties agree that new briefing would be necessary given the change in circumstances since the Motion to Compel was filed.

7. Accordingly, the Parties stipulate and agree to the withdrawal of their Motion to Compel Production of Documents [ECF No. 49], without prejudice. The DaVita Parties reserve all rights related to the Motion to Compel.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. The DaVita Parties' Motion to Compel Production of Documents [ECF No. 49] is hereby withdrawn, without prejudice.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer