United States v. Todd, 1:16-CR-0427-AT-30. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20190920853
Visitors: 5
Filed: Sep. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 19, 2019
Summary: ORDER AMY TOTENBERG , District Judge . Presently before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("R&R") [Doc. 1089] recommending that defendant's Motion to Suppress [Doc. 621] and Motion for Jackson-Denno Hearing [Doc. 622] be denied. A district judge has broad discretion to accept, reject, or modify a magistrate judge's proposed findings and recommendations. United States v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667 , 680 (1980). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), the Court reviews
Summary: ORDER AMY TOTENBERG , District Judge . Presently before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("R&R") [Doc. 1089] recommending that defendant's Motion to Suppress [Doc. 621] and Motion for Jackson-Denno Hearing [Doc. 622] be denied. A district judge has broad discretion to accept, reject, or modify a magistrate judge's proposed findings and recommendations. United States v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667 , 680 (1980). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), the Court reviews a..
More
ORDER
AMY TOTENBERG, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("R&R") [Doc. 1089] recommending that defendant's Motion to Suppress [Doc. 621] and Motion for Jackson-Denno Hearing [Doc. 622] be denied.
A district judge has broad discretion to accept, reject, or modify a magistrate judge's proposed findings and recommendations. United States v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 680 (1980). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court reviews any portion of the R&R that is the subject of a proper objection on a de novo basis and any non-objected portion on a "clearly erroneous" standard. Defendant has filed no objections to the R&R; therefore, the Court reviews the record in this case for clear error.
After an independent review of the record, the Court finds that the R&R is correct. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's R&R [Doc. 1089]; and DENIES Defendant's Motion to Suppress [Doc. 621] and Motion for Jackson-Denno Hearing [Doc. 622].
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
