Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

HASAN v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., 16-2990 (JRT/SER). (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Minnesota Number: infdco20170414c26 Visitors: 2
Filed: Apr. 13, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 13, 2017
Summary: ORDER JOHN R. TUNHEIM , Chief District Judge . This matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau, dated March 22, 2017 [Docket No. 47]. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. Based on the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendant Bank of America, N.A.'s ("BANA") Moti
More

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau, dated March 22, 2017 [Docket No. 47]. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted.

Based on the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant Bank of America, N.A.'s ("BANA") Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 5] be DENIED as moot;

2. Defendants Usset, Weingarden, & Liebo, PLLP, and David J. Usset's (collectively, "Usset") Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 11] be DENIED as moot;

3. Plaintiff Rashad Hasan's ("Hasan") Objection and Motion to Remand [Docket No. 14] be DENIED;

4. BANA's Renewed Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 22] be GRANTED;

5. Usset's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint [Docket No. 29] be GRANTED;

6. Hasan's Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 34] be DENIED; and

7. This case be DISMISSED with prejudice.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer