Valencia v. Commissioner of Social Security, 1:19-cv-0758-JLT. (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20200131798
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jan. 30, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 30, 2020
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME (Doc. 13) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On January 17, 2020, the parties stipulated for Plaintiff to have an extension of thirty days to file an opening brief. (Doc. 13 at 1-2) Notably, the Scheduling Order permits a single thirty-day extension by the stipulation of parties (Doc. 6-1 at 3), and this is the first extension requested by either party. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS: 1. The extension of time is GRANTED
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME (Doc. 13) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On January 17, 2020, the parties stipulated for Plaintiff to have an extension of thirty days to file an opening brief. (Doc. 13 at 1-2) Notably, the Scheduling Order permits a single thirty-day extension by the stipulation of parties (Doc. 6-1 at 3), and this is the first extension requested by either party. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS: 1. The extension of time is GRANTED ..
More
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME
(Doc. 13)
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
On January 17, 2020, the parties stipulated for Plaintiff to have an extension of thirty days to file an opening brief. (Doc. 13 at 1-2) Notably, the Scheduling Order permits a single thirty-day extension by the stipulation of parties (Doc. 6-1 at 3), and this is the first extension requested by either party. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS:
1. The extension of time is GRANTED nunc pro tunc; and
2. Plaintiff SHALL file an opening brief no later than February 26, 2020.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
