SETZER v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, 10-5151. (2012)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20120124730
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jan. 23, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 23, 2012
Summary: ORDER JIMM LARRY HENDREN, District Judge. Now on this 23rd day of January, 2012, come on for consideration defendants' Motion For Summary Judgment (document #26) and the Report And Recommendation Of The Magistrate Judge (document #32). No objections have been made to the Report And Recommendation, and the Court, having carefully reviewed it, finds that it is sound in all respects, and that it should be adopted in toto. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report And Recommendation Of The
Summary: ORDER JIMM LARRY HENDREN, District Judge. Now on this 23rd day of January, 2012, come on for consideration defendants' Motion For Summary Judgment (document #26) and the Report And Recommendation Of The Magistrate Judge (document #32). No objections have been made to the Report And Recommendation, and the Court, having carefully reviewed it, finds that it is sound in all respects, and that it should be adopted in toto. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report And Recommendation Of The ..
More
ORDER
JIMM LARRY HENDREN, District Judge.
Now on this 23rd day of January, 2012, come on for consideration defendants' Motion For Summary Judgment (document #26) and the Report And Recommendation Of The Magistrate Judge (document #32). No objections have been made to the Report And Recommendation, and the Court, having carefully reviewed it, finds that it is sound in all respects, and that it should be adopted in toto.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report And Recommendation Of The Magistrate Judge is adopted in toto.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the Report And Recommendation Of The Magistrate Judge, defendants' Motion For Summary Judgment (document #26) is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
