SMITH v. JONES, 3:13cv-881-WHA (WO). (2016)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20160301641
Visitors: 22
Filed: Feb. 29, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 29, 2016
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON , Senior District Judge . This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #18), entered on February 2, 2016. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that this petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254 is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice because the petition is time-barred under the one-year
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON , Senior District Judge . This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #18), entered on February 2, 2016. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that this petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254 is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice because the petition is time-barred under the one-year ..
More
ORDER
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge.
This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #18), entered on February 2, 2016. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby
ORDERED that this petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice because the petition is time-barred under the one-year limitation period in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). Final Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Source: Leagle
