Filed: May 28, 2015
Latest Update: May 28, 2015
Summary: ORDER MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Based on the representations made on May 20, 2015, in open court, it is ORDERED that an evidentiary hearing is set for June 10, 2015, at 9:00 a.m., in the Frank M. Johnson Jr. United States Courthouse Complex, Courtroom 2FMJ, One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama, on the following four motions: defendant John W. Mitchell's first motion in limine (intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and fractional flow reserve (FFR)) (doc. no. 85); defendant Mitchell's
Summary: ORDER MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Based on the representations made on May 20, 2015, in open court, it is ORDERED that an evidentiary hearing is set for June 10, 2015, at 9:00 a.m., in the Frank M. Johnson Jr. United States Courthouse Complex, Courtroom 2FMJ, One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama, on the following four motions: defendant John W. Mitchell's first motion in limine (intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and fractional flow reserve (FFR)) (doc. no. 85); defendant Mitchell's ..
More
ORDER
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
Based on the representations made on May 20, 2015, in open court, it is ORDERED that an evidentiary hearing is set for June 10, 2015, at 9:00 a.m., in the Frank M. Johnson Jr. United States Courthouse Complex, Courtroom 2FMJ, One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama, on the following four motions: defendant John W. Mitchell's first motion in limine (intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and fractional flow reserve (FFR)) (doc. no. 85); defendant Mitchell's motion to exclude (Dr. Hirshfeld) (doc. no. 91); defendant Mitchell's motion to exclude (Dr. Kim) (doc. no. 92); and defendant Mitchell's motion to strike (government argument regarding Dr. Hirshfeld) (doc. no. 112).
Counsel for all parties are to meet with Chief Deputy Clerk Trey Granger, Courtroom Deputy Clerk Wanda Robinson, and other court personnel to arrange for Drs. John Hirshfeld and Paul Kim to testify by videoconferencing about the issues raised in these motions. The court understands that defendant Mitchell agrees to videoconferencing.
