Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Arroyo v. Chase, Inc., 1:18-cv-01675-LJO-BAM. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190319847 Visitors: 35
Filed: Mar. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 18, 2019
Summary: ORDER RE REQUEST TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE (Doc. No. 6) BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . On March 13, 2019, Plaintiff filed a request to continue the Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for March 19, 2019, on the grounds that Defendant Chase, Inc. has not yet appeared or responded to the complaint and Plaintiff intends to seek its default. (Doc. No. 6.) Based on the status of this action, and for good cause appearing, the Initial Scheduling Conference currently set
More

ORDER RE REQUEST TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

(Doc. No. 6)

On March 13, 2019, Plaintiff filed a request to continue the Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for March 19, 2019, on the grounds that Defendant Chase, Inc. has not yet appeared or responded to the complaint and Plaintiff intends to seek its default. (Doc. No. 6.) Based on the status of this action, and for good cause appearing, the Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for March 19, 2019, is HEREBY CONTINUED to May 6, 2019 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 8 before Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. A JOINT Scheduling Conference Report, carefully prepared and executed by all counsel, shall be electronically filed in full compliance with the requirements set forth in the Order Setting Mandatory Scheduling Conference (Doc. No. 3) one (1) full week prior to the Scheduling Conference, and a copy shall be emailed, in Word format, to bamorders@caed.uscourts.gov. The parties may appear at the scheduling conference by telephone with each party using the following dial-in number and passcode: dial-in number 1-877-411-9748; passcode 3190866.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer