U.S. v. MITCHELL, 3:14cr306-MHT(WO). (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20150526a97
Visitors: 17
Filed: May 22, 2015
Latest Update: May 22, 2015
Summary: ORDER MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Based on the representations made in open court on May 20, 2015, it is ORDERED that the government's motion in limine to exclude evidence of specific acts of good conduct (doc. no. 90) is granted subject to the following: reconsideration of the motion at trial and with the understanding (1) that, should defendant John W. Mitchell seek to introduce evidence potentially subject to the motion at trial (as outlined in open court on May 20), he should s
Summary: ORDER MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Based on the representations made in open court on May 20, 2015, it is ORDERED that the government's motion in limine to exclude evidence of specific acts of good conduct (doc. no. 90) is granted subject to the following: reconsideration of the motion at trial and with the understanding (1) that, should defendant John W. Mitchell seek to introduce evidence potentially subject to the motion at trial (as outlined in open court on May 20), he should se..
More
ORDER
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
Based on the representations made in open court on May 20, 2015, it is ORDERED that the government's motion in limine to exclude evidence of specific acts of good conduct (doc. no. 90) is granted subject to the following: reconsideration of the motion at trial and with the understanding (1) that, should defendant John W. Mitchell seek to introduce evidence potentially subject to the motion at trial (as outlined in open court on May 20), he should seek a hearing outside the presence of the jury before introducing the evidence and (2) that, if the government anticipates the introduction of such evidence during trial (as outlined in open court on May 20), it should object before the evidence is introduced and seek a hearing outside the presence of the jury.
Source: Leagle
