Lefrancis v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc., 2:17-cv-02780-GMN-CWH. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180214f25
Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 13, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING LLC TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [FIRST STIPULATED EXTENSION RE: FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT] CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1 and 6-2, Defendant Specialized Loan Servicing LLC ("SLS" or "Defendant") and Plaintiff Kathy A. Lefrancis ("Plaintiff") hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's complaint to March 2,
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING LLC TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [FIRST STIPULATED EXTENSION RE: FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT] CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1 and 6-2, Defendant Specialized Loan Servicing LLC ("SLS" or "Defendant") and Plaintiff Kathy A. Lefrancis ("Plaintiff") hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's complaint to March 2, ..
More
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING LLC TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
[FIRST STIPULATED EXTENSION RE: FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT]
CARL W. HOFFMAN, Magistrate Judge.
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1 and 6-2, Defendant Specialized Loan Servicing LLC ("SLS" or "Defendant") and Plaintiff Kathy A. Lefrancis ("Plaintiff") hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's complaint to March 2, 2018. The parties agree to this extension in good faith to allow Defendant additional time to review and investigate Plaintiff's allegations prior to responding to the First Amended Complaint ("FAC") and to allow the parties an opportunity to explore possible settlement options prior to incurring significant litigation expenses. This is the first stipulated extension of Defendant's deadline to respond to the FAC.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
