COOPER v. KAUR, CIV S-10-1057 GEB DAD P. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20120120939
Visitors: 18
Filed: Jan. 19, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 19, 2012
Summary: ORDER GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., District Judge. On June 15, 2011, the Magistrate Judge issued an order denying appointment of counsel. On January 11, 2012, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of that order. Local Rule 303(b), states "rulings by Magistrate Judges shall be final if no reconsideration thereof is sought from the Court within fourteen days . . . from the date of service of the ruling on the parties . . ." E.D. Local Rule 303(b). Plaintiff's request for reconsideration of th
Summary: ORDER GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., District Judge. On June 15, 2011, the Magistrate Judge issued an order denying appointment of counsel. On January 11, 2012, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of that order. Local Rule 303(b), states "rulings by Magistrate Judges shall be final if no reconsideration thereof is sought from the Court within fourteen days . . . from the date of service of the ruling on the parties . . ." E.D. Local Rule 303(b). Plaintiff's request for reconsideration of the..
More
ORDER
GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., District Judge.
On June 15, 2011, the Magistrate Judge issued an order denying appointment of counsel. On January 11, 2012, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of that order. Local Rule 303(b), states "rulings by Magistrate Judges shall be final if no reconsideration thereof is sought from the Court within fourteen days . . . from the date of service of the ruling on the parties . . ." E.D. Local Rule 303(b). Plaintiff's request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order of June 15, 2011, is therefore untimely.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (Doc. No. 57) is denied.
Source: Leagle
