Montoya v. Commissioner of Social Security, 2:18-cv-01081-JAM-CKD. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190204808
Visitors: 25
Filed: Feb. 01, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 01, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate that Plaintiff shall have a fifteen (15) day extension of time until February 15, 2019, in which to e-file his Motion for Summary Judgement. Defendant shall file any opposition, including cross-motion, on or before March 18, 2019. This extension is necessitated due to Plaintiff's counsel's upcoming schedule of administrative hearings and district cou
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate that Plaintiff shall have a fifteen (15) day extension of time until February 15, 2019, in which to e-file his Motion for Summary Judgement. Defendant shall file any opposition, including cross-motion, on or before March 18, 2019. This extension is necessitated due to Plaintiff's counsel's upcoming schedule of administrative hearings and district cour..
More
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate that Plaintiff shall have a fifteen (15) day extension of time until February 15, 2019, in which to e-file his Motion for Summary Judgement. Defendant shall file any opposition, including cross-motion, on or before March 18, 2019. This extension is necessitated due to Plaintiff's counsel's upcoming schedule of administrative hearings and district court briefs due (fourteen opening briefs and three reply briefs). Plaintiff makes this request in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings. Defendant has no objection to requested relief.
IT IS ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
