HALO ELECTRONICS, INC. v. PULSE ENGINEERING, INC., 2:07-cv-00331-APG (PAL). (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20161208c72
Visitors: 13
Filed: Dec. 07, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 07, 2016
Summary: UNOPPOSED REQUEST FOR EXTENTION OF TIME TO FILE ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . Plaintiff Halo Electronics, Inc. respectively requests an extension of time to file its reply brief in support of its Motion for Enhanced Damages and Attorney Fees. (D.I. 608.) After the Status Conference on September 27, 2016, the Court issued minutes that set a December 16, 2016, deadline for Halo's brief. Halo seeks a two-week extension to December 30, 2016. Halo requests this extension because Pulse's op
Summary: UNOPPOSED REQUEST FOR EXTENTION OF TIME TO FILE ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . Plaintiff Halo Electronics, Inc. respectively requests an extension of time to file its reply brief in support of its Motion for Enhanced Damages and Attorney Fees. (D.I. 608.) After the Status Conference on September 27, 2016, the Court issued minutes that set a December 16, 2016, deadline for Halo's brief. Halo seeks a two-week extension to December 30, 2016. Halo requests this extension because Pulse's opp..
More
UNOPPOSED REQUEST FOR EXTENTION OF TIME TO FILE
ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Halo Electronics, Inc. respectively requests an extension of time to file its reply brief in support of its Motion for Enhanced Damages and Attorney Fees. (D.I. 608.) After the Status Conference on September 27, 2016, the Court issued minutes that set a December 16, 2016, deadline for Halo's brief. Halo seeks a two-week extension to December 30, 2016. Halo requests this extension because Pulse's opposition seeks to rely on evidence that is not in the record, namely two opinions of counsel that had been maintained as privileged by Pulse throughout discovery and trial. Halo agreed to the briefing schedule during the status conference based on Pulse's representations that the briefing would be focused on the record developed at trial.
Pulse does not oppose Halo's request for an extension of time. This is the first request for an extension of time for Halo's reply brief on its Motion for Enhanced Damages and Attorney Fees.
Source: Leagle
