Williamson v. Aetna Life Insurance Company, 2:17-CV-02653-RFB-CWH. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180907a68
Visitors: 10
Filed: Sep. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 06, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR AETNA TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S OPENING BRIEF (Second Request) CARL W. HOFFMAN , District Judge . Plaintiff Sondra Williamson and defendant Aetna Life Insurance Company hereby stipulate and request the Court to extend Aetna's deadline to file its the opposition brief on the merits of the ERISA claim by 36 days, from Monday, September 24, 2018 through and including Tuesday, October 30, 2018. Aetna requested the courtesy of a stipulation, and Williamson agreed,
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR AETNA TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S OPENING BRIEF (Second Request) CARL W. HOFFMAN , District Judge . Plaintiff Sondra Williamson and defendant Aetna Life Insurance Company hereby stipulate and request the Court to extend Aetna's deadline to file its the opposition brief on the merits of the ERISA claim by 36 days, from Monday, September 24, 2018 through and including Tuesday, October 30, 2018. Aetna requested the courtesy of a stipulation, and Williamson agreed, ..
More
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR AETNA TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S OPENING BRIEF
(Second Request)
CARL W. HOFFMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Sondra Williamson and defendant Aetna Life Insurance Company hereby stipulate and request the Court to extend Aetna's deadline to file its the opposition brief on the merits of the ERISA claim by 36 days, from Monday, September 24, 2018 through and including Tuesday, October 30, 2018. Aetna requested the courtesy of a stipulation, and Williamson agreed, in order to accommodate counsel's significant out-of-town work travel schedule.
As a consequence of the initial extension, the parties also stipulate and request the Court to extend the plaintiff's deadline to file its reply by 36 days, from October 22, 2018, through and including November 27, 2018.
The parties certify that this stipulation was done in good faith and not for the purposes of delay.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
