Filed: Jun. 03, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 03, 2014
Summary: ORDER SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff's objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the relevant record, see 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C), the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Cour
Summary: ORDER SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff's objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the relevant record, see 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C), the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court..
More
ORDER
SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff's objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the relevant record, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1. Defendants' Motion to Deem Admitted (Doc. No. 119) is DENIED.
2. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 116) is GRANTED.
3. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Iko, McBride, Hubbard, Gardner and Corizon, Inc., are DISMISSED with prejudice.
4. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.1
SO ORDERED.
