MACK v. DILLON, 4:07-cv-74-DPM. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20120203717
Visitors: 4
Filed: Feb. 02, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 02, 2012
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL Jr., District Judge. For the reasons stated on the record during the 1 February 2012 pre-trial hearing, Dillon's motion in limine, Document No. 216, is granted, on both points, as agreed by the parties. Additionally, Mack and Dillon have agreed to use the same jury instructions from the first trial and the same exhibits as before, with these additions: Mack intends to offer the clothes he wore the night of the robbery, as well as the LRPD's use-of-force policy in effect w
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL Jr., District Judge. For the reasons stated on the record during the 1 February 2012 pre-trial hearing, Dillon's motion in limine, Document No. 216, is granted, on both points, as agreed by the parties. Additionally, Mack and Dillon have agreed to use the same jury instructions from the first trial and the same exhibits as before, with these additions: Mack intends to offer the clothes he wore the night of the robbery, as well as the LRPD's use-of-force policy in effect wh..
More
ORDER
D.P. MARSHALL Jr., District Judge.
For the reasons stated on the record during the 1 February 2012 pre-trial hearing, Dillon's motion in limine, Document No. 216, is granted, on both points, as agreed by the parties. Additionally, Mack and Dillon have agreed to use the same jury instructions from the first trial and the same exhibits as before, with these additions: Mack intends to offer the clothes he wore the night of the robbery, as well as the LRPD's use-of-force policy in effect when Mack was arrested. Dillon may also use these new exhibits as he desires. And in particular he may examine witnesses about the policy.
So Ordered.
Source: Leagle
