RUPERT v. MILLS, 3:14-CV-161 JM/BD. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20150521913
Visitors: 6
Filed: May 20, 2015
Latest Update: May 20, 2015
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY , District Judge . The Court has received a Recommended Disposition ("Recommendation") filed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. After careful review of the Recommendation, the timely objections, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Recommendation should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court's findings in all respects. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (docket entry #82) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' claims are DISMISSED
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY , District Judge . The Court has received a Recommended Disposition ("Recommendation") filed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. After careful review of the Recommendation, the timely objections, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Recommendation should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court's findings in all respects. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (docket entry #82) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' claims are DISMISSED,..
More
ORDER
JAMES M. MOODY, District Judge.
The Court has received a Recommended Disposition ("Recommendation") filed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. After careful review of the Recommendation, the timely objections, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Recommendation should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court's findings in all respects.
Defendants' motion for summary judgment (docket entry #82) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' claims are DISMISSED, with prejudice. Mr. Rupert's motion for order (#75) is DENIED, as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
