WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. v. VEGAS PROPERTY SERVICES INC., 2:17-cv-01463-MMD-PAL. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20170802c78
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jul. 31, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 31, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS (SECOND REQUEST) MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo") and Defendant Spanish Trail Master Association ("Spanish Trail", collectively with Wells Fargo, the "Parties) hereby stipulate and agree that Wells Fargo's opposition to Spanish Trail's Motion to Dismiss ("Motion to Dismiss", ECF No. 16), which is currently due August 4, 2017, may be extended to August 18, 2017. Wells Fargo
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS (SECOND REQUEST) MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo") and Defendant Spanish Trail Master Association ("Spanish Trail", collectively with Wells Fargo, the "Parties) hereby stipulate and agree that Wells Fargo's opposition to Spanish Trail's Motion to Dismiss ("Motion to Dismiss", ECF No. 16), which is currently due August 4, 2017, may be extended to August 18, 2017. Wells Fargo ..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS
(SECOND REQUEST)
MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.
Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo") and Defendant Spanish Trail Master Association ("Spanish Trail", collectively with Wells Fargo, the "Parties) hereby stipulate and agree that Wells Fargo's opposition to Spanish Trail's Motion to Dismiss ("Motion to Dismiss", ECF No. 16), which is currently due August 4, 2017, may be extended to August 18, 2017.
Wells Fargo is in the process of assessing the Motion to Dismiss and the arguments raised therein. Wells Fargo is analyzing the possibility for a resolution of the Motion to Dismiss without the need for the Court's intervention. Wells Fargo is also assessing recent decisions and orders from other Courts that may have an effect on its response to the Motion to Dismiss. Accordingly, additional time will be required and good cause exists for the extension.
Based on the foregoing, the Parties respectfully request that the Court grant this
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
