GARDNER v. DAVIS-PEPPERS, 5:13CV00353 BSM. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20150610a13
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jun. 09, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 09, 2015
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , Chief District Judge . The recommended disposition ("RD") submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and Wallace Gardner's objections thereto have been reviewed. After careful consideration of these documents and a de novo review of the record, the RD is hereby adopted in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 43] is granted and Gardner's complaint is dismissed with prejudice. 2. It is cer
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , Chief District Judge . The recommended disposition ("RD") submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and Wallace Gardner's objections thereto have been reviewed. After careful consideration of these documents and a de novo review of the record, the RD is hereby adopted in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 43] is granted and Gardner's complaint is dismissed with prejudice. 2. It is cert..
More
ORDER
BRIAN S. MILLER, Chief District Judge.
The recommended disposition ("RD") submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and Wallace Gardner's objections thereto have been reviewed. After careful consideration of these documents and a de novo review of the record, the RD is hereby adopted in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 43] is granted and Gardner's complaint is dismissed with prejudice.
2. It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order and the accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
