JONES v. CLARK, 2:14-cv-0987 CKD P. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20150904610
Visitors: 18
Filed: Sep. 03, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 03, 2015
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file an opposition to defendant's August 12, 2015 motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 48.) However, due to outstanding discovery issues, the court has vacated the dispositive motion deadline. (ECF No. 47.) Similarly, plaintiff need not respond to defendant's summary judgment motion until the discovery process is complete. The court will reset the dispositive motion deadline at a later time, along
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file an opposition to defendant's August 12, 2015 motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 48.) However, due to outstanding discovery issues, the court has vacated the dispositive motion deadline. (ECF No. 47.) Similarly, plaintiff need not respond to defendant's summary judgment motion until the discovery process is complete. The court will reset the dispositive motion deadline at a later time, along ..
More
ORDER
CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file an opposition to defendant's August 12, 2015 motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 48.) However, due to outstanding discovery issues, the court has vacated the dispositive motion deadline. (ECF No. 47.) Similarly, plaintiff need not respond to defendant's summary judgment motion until the discovery process is complete. The court will reset the dispositive motion deadline at a later time, along with a deadline for plaintiff to respond to defendant's motion.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff need not respond to defendant's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 44) until the court so orders; and
2. Plaintiff's motion for extension of time (ECF No. 48) is denied as moot.
Source: Leagle
