De La Rosa v. Berryhill, 1:18-CV-00938-SKO. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190405c08
Visitors: 9
Filed: Apr. 04, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 04, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR A FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE HER RESPONSIVE BRIEF (Doc. 15) SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Opening Brief be extended 30 days from April 4, 2019, to May 5, 2019. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's Opening Brief. There is good cause for this extension re
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR A FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE HER RESPONSIVE BRIEF (Doc. 15) SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Opening Brief be extended 30 days from April 4, 2019, to May 5, 2019. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's Opening Brief. There is good cause for this extension req..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR A FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE HER RESPONSIVE BRIEF
(Doc. 15)
SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Opening Brief be extended 30 days from April 4, 2019, to May 5, 2019. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's Opening Brief. There is good cause for this extension request because counsel for Defendant has workload issues that preclude filing the responsive brief by April 4, 2019. Counsel for Defendant is a newly appointed Special Assistant United States attorney with the Office of General Counsel and her workload is reviewed by senior attorneys in this office. Counsel for Defendant apologizes to Plaintiff and the Court for any inconvenience caused by this delay. The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the parties' above stipulation (Doc. 15) and approves Defendant's request for a 30-day extension of time to file her responsive brief. The Court GRANTS Defendant an extension until May 6, 2019, to file her responsive brief. All remaining deadlines in the Court's scheduling order (Doc. 5), are extended accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
