Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ducey v. Commissioner of Social Security, 1:19-cv-00792-BAM. (2020)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20200117c23 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 16, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 16, 2020
Summary: AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, subject to the approval of the Court, to extend the time for plaintiff to serve plaintiff's letter brief to February 15, 2020. The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly. The administrative transcript was filed on October 15, 2019. Plaintiff counsel's office inadvertently missed the email and did not c
More

AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, subject to the approval of the Court, to extend the time for plaintiff to serve plaintiff's letter brief to February 15, 2020.

The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.

The administrative transcript was filed on October 15, 2019. Plaintiff counsel's office inadvertently missed the email and did not calendar the date for service of the letter brief. This error was discovered on January 15, 2020. Plaintiff counsel apologizes for the delay and inconvenience to the court caused by this error.

Therefore, plaintiff counsel requests additional time to review the file and prepare the letter brief. Per Defendant counsel's email on January 15, 2020, defendant has no objection. Dated: January 15, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

Dated: January 15, 2020 Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Sharon E. Kelly SHARON E. KELLY Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: January 15, 2020 McGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney JEFFREY L. LODGE Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration By: /s/ Asim Modi (As authorized via email) ASIM MODI Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Defendant

ORDER

The Scheduling Order may be modified only for good cause and with the Court's consent. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). A calendaring error is generally not considered good cause. See Sprague v. Fin. Credit Network, Inc., 2018 WL 4616688, at *3-4 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 25, 2018). Moreover, requests for Court-approved extensions brought on or after the applicable deadline are looked upon with disfavor. Local Rule 144(d). Nonetheless, based upon the parties' consent to extension, and in the interest of justice, the Court finds that a limited continuance as requested is warranted and no prejudice will result.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that that the deadline for Plaintiff to file a letter brief is extended to February 15, 2020. All other dates in the Court's Scheduling Order are extended accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer