U.S. v. NUNEZ-GONZALEZ, CR 11-01831-03-TUC-RCC [BPV]. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Arizona
Number: infdco20140429979
Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 28, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 28, 2014
Summary: ORDER RANER C. COLLINS, Chief District Judge. This matter was referred to the U.S. Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and the Local Rules of Practice of this Court for an evidentiary hearing and a Report and Recommendation on Defendant Marcos Nunez-Gonzalez' Motion To Suppress. Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Velasco's Report and Recommendation. The Magistrate Judge recommends to the Court that the Motion To Suppress should be DENIED. Accordingly, after conducting a d
Summary: ORDER RANER C. COLLINS, Chief District Judge. This matter was referred to the U.S. Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and the Local Rules of Practice of this Court for an evidentiary hearing and a Report and Recommendation on Defendant Marcos Nunez-Gonzalez' Motion To Suppress. Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Velasco's Report and Recommendation. The Magistrate Judge recommends to the Court that the Motion To Suppress should be DENIED. Accordingly, after conducting a de..
More
ORDER
RANER C. COLLINS, Chief District Judge.
This matter was referred to the U.S. Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and the Local Rules of Practice of this Court for an evidentiary hearing and a Report and Recommendation on Defendant Marcos Nunez-Gonzalez' Motion To Suppress. Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Velasco's Report and Recommendation. The Magistrate Judge recommends to the Court that the Motion To Suppress should be DENIED. Accordingly, after conducting a de novo review of the record;
IT IS ORDERED that the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [Doc 111] in its entirety. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion To Suppress [Doc 84 & 100] is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
