McNEAL v. FLEMING, 2:02-cv-2524 TLN CKD P. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20141205738
Visitors: 29
Filed: Dec. 04, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 04, 2014
Summary: ORDER TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge. On November 10, 2014, Plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed October 27, 2014 denying Plaintiff's September 2, 2014 motion to compel. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the Court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. There
Summary: ORDER TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge. On November 10, 2014, Plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed October 27, 2014 denying Plaintiff's September 2, 2014 motion to compel. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the Court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Theref..
More
ORDER
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
On November 10, 2014, Plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed October 27, 2014 denying Plaintiff's September 2, 2014 motion to compel. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the Court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling is clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed October 27, 2014, is affirmed.
Source: Leagle
