Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Bejarano v. Allison, 1:11-cv-00589 LJO DLB PC. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160519985 Visitors: 28
Filed: May 18, 2016
Latest Update: May 18, 2016
Summary: ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY (Document 117) DENNIS L. BECK , Magistratef Judge . Plaintiff Bob Bejarano ("Plaintiff") is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on April 12, 2011. On April 28, 2016, the Court issued Findings and Recommendations regarding Defendants' motion to dismiss. On May 16, 2016, Plaintiff filed a notice in which he questions why a m
More

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY

(Document 117)

Plaintiff Bob Bejarano ("Plaintiff") is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on April 12, 2011.

On April 28, 2016, the Court issued Findings and Recommendations regarding Defendants' motion to dismiss.

On May 16, 2016, Plaintiff filed a notice in which he questions why a magistrate judge other than the one assigned to this action signed the Findings and Recommendations. Plaintiff is advised that while specific judges are assigned to an action as a matter of Court administration, the District Court judges' referral power is general. 28 U.S.C. § 636. Therefore, even though one magistrate judge may be assigned to an action, another magistrate judge may act on an order within the action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer