LAWRENCE O. ANDERSON, Magistrate Judge.
In accordance with the Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), a detention hearing has been held. I conclude that the following facts are established: (Check one or both, as applicable.)
[] by clear and convincing evidence Defendant is a danger to the community and require the detention of Defendant pending trial in this case.
[X] by a preponderance of the evidence Defendant is a serious flight risk and require the detention of Defendant pending trial in this case.
[] (1) Defendant has been convicted of a (federal offense)(state or local offense that would have been a federal offense if a circumstance giving rise to federal jurisdiction had existed) that is
[] a crime of violence as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 3156(a)(4).
[] an offense for which the maximum sentence is life imprisonment or death.
[] an offense for which a maximum term of imprisonment of ten years or more is prescribed in ____________________________________________________________________________
[] a felony that was committed after Defendant had been convicted of two or more prior federal offenses described in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(1)(A)-(C), or comparable state or local offenses.
[] (2) The offense described in finding 1 was committed while Defendant was on release pending trial for a federal, state or local offense.
[] (3) A period of not more than five years has elapsed since the (date of conviction)(release of Defendant from imprisonment) for the offense described in finding No. 1.
[] (4) Findings Nos. (1), (2) and (3) establish a rebuttable presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the safety of other person(s) and the community. I further find that Defendant has not rebutted this presumption.
[] (1) There is probable cause to believe that Defendant has committed an offense
[] for which a maximum term of imprisonment of ten years or more is prescribed in ________________________________________________________
[] under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)
[] (2) Defendant has not rebutted the presumption established by finding No. 1 that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of Defendant as required and the safety of the community.
[] (1) There is a serious risk that Defendant will flee; no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of Defendant as required.
[] (2) No condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the safety of others and the community.
[] (3) There is a serious risk that Defendant will (obstruct or attempt to obstruct justice) (threaten, injure, or intimidate a prospective witness or juror).
[] (4) _____________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________
[] (1) I find that the credible testimony and information
[X] (2) I find that a preponderance of the evidence as to risk of flight that:
[X] Defendant is not a citizen of the United States.
[X] Defendant, at the time of the charged offense, was in the United States illegally.
[] If released herein, Defendant faces deportation proceedings by the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, placing him/her beyond the jurisdiction of this Court.
[] Defendant has no significant contacts in the United States or in the District of Arizona.
[] Defendant has no resources in the United States from which he/she might make a bond reasonably calculated to assure his/her future appearance.
[] Defendant has a prior criminal history.
[] Defendant lives and works in Mexico.
[] Defendant is an amnesty applicant but has no substantial ties in Arizona or in then United States and has substantial family ties to Mexico.
[] There is a record of Defendant's prior failure to appear in court as ordered.
[] Defendant attempted to evade law enforcement contact by fleeing from law enforcement.
[] Defendant is facing a minimum mandatory of _________________ incarceration and a maximum of __________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________
[] Defendant does not dispute the information contained in the Pretrial Services Report, except: __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________
[] In addition: __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________
The Court incorporates by reference the findings of the Pretrial Services Agency which were reviewed by the Court at the time of the hearing in this matter.