ARENAS v. ENANMOH, 1:08-cv-01351-LJO-BAM PC. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20120509810
Visitors: 7
Filed: May 08, 2012
Latest Update: May 08, 2012
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (ECF No. 83, 84) ORDER THAT DISMISSAL IS SUBJECT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915(G) LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, District Judge. Plaintiff Manuel Arenas ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Ru
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (ECF No. 83, 84) ORDER THAT DISMISSAL IS SUBJECT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915(G) LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, District Judge. Plaintiff Manuel Arenas ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rul..
More
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (ECF No. 83, 84)
ORDER THAT DISMISSAL IS SUBJECT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(G)
LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, District Judge.
Plaintiff Manuel Arenas ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On April 4, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that the action be dismissed for failure to state a claim. The parties were given thirty days within which to file objections. The Court has considered Plaintiff's objections filed on May 7, 2012.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations, filed April 4, 2012, is adopted in full;
2. This action, is dismissed, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under section 1983;
3. This dismissal is subject to the "three-strikes" provision set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Silva v. Vittorio, No. 08-15620, 2011 WL 4436248, at *4 (9th Cir. Sept. 26, 2011); and
4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
