STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING FOR MOTIONS IN LIMINE FILED BY THE INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS, THE TOSHIBA DEFENDANTS AND THE SAMSUNG SDI DEFENDANTS

SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge.

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Stipulation and Order Regarding Scheduling (Doc. No. 3182), the Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs ("IPPs") filed nineteen motions in limine ("IPP motions in limine")1 on February 13, 2015;

WHEREAS, on February 13, 2015, the Toshiba Defendants filed four separate motions in limine ("Toshiba separate motions in limine")2 and twelve motions in limine jointly with the other defendants ("Toshiba joint motions in limine")3 that pertain to the IPPs;

WHEREAS, on February 13, 2015, the Samsung SDI Defendants filed two separate motions in limine4 ("Samsung separate motions limine") and twelve motions in limine jointly with the other defendants5 ("Samsung joint motions in limine") that pertain to the IPPs;

WHEREAS, IPPs' MIL Nos. 3 (Doc. No. 3539) and 11 (Doc. No. 3547), and Defendants' Joint MIL No. 14 (Doc. No. 3581), were resolved by stipulation dated February 27, 2015 (Doc. No. 3639);

WHEREAS, SDI's MIL No. 2 (Doc. No. 3565) was not opposed by IPPs;

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Stipulation and Order Regarding Deadline for Briefing and Hearing Date for Motions in Limine (Doc. No. 3605) (the "MIL Order"), all parties filed responses to the motions pertaining to them on February 27, 2015;6

WHEREAS, pursuant to the MIL Order, replies in support of the motions in limine are due on March 6, 2015;

WHEREAS, the Toshiba Defendants also filed a Motion to Strike Class Representatives with Inadequate Proof of Their Individual Purchases of Televisions or Monitors (Doc. No. 3595) ("Motion to Strike");

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Stipulation and Order Regarding Briefing for the Toshiba Defendants' Motion to Decertify the Statewide IPP Classes for Damages and Motion to Strike Class Representatives with Inadequate Proof of their Individual Purchases of Televisions or Monitors (Doc. No. 3630), the IPPs' opposition to the Motion to Strike is due on March 6, 2015 and the Toshiba Defendants' reply is due on March 17, 2015;

WHEREAS, counsel for the IPPs, the Toshiba Defendants and the Samsung SDI Defendants have met and conferred and agree that an extension of the briefing schedule on these motions is appropriate and will aid in the efficient resolution of the litigation;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the IPPs, the Toshiba Defendants and the Samsung SDI Defendants as follows:

1. The replies in support of the IPPs' motions in limine, the Toshiba and SDI separate motions in limine, and the Toshiba and SDI joint motions in limine (as they pertain to the IPPs) may be filed no later than March 16, 2015;

2. IPPs' opposition to the Toshiba Defendants' Motion to Strike must be filed no later than March 16, 2015;

3. The Toshiba Defendants' reply in support of their Motion to Strike may be filed no later than March 27, 2015.

The undersigned parties jointly and respectfully request that the Court enter this stipulation as an order.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i), the filer attests that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the above signatories.